You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Potential trophic cascades triggered by the barred owl range expansion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Wildlife Society Bulletin, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1002/wsb.714 |
| Authors |
Samantha R. Holm, Barry R. Noon, J. David Wiens, William J. Ripple |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Finland | 1 | 6% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 6% |
| North Macedonia | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 7 | 44% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 12 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 14 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,204,515
of 25,600,774 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#41
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,786
of 418,449 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,600,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,449 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.