| Title |
An adaptive model for synchrony in the firefly Pteroptyx malaccae
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Mathematical Biology, June 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf00164052 |
| Authors |
B. Ermentrout |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 121 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 36 | 28% |
| Researcher | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 25 | 19% |
| Engineering | 22 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 10 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 22 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,001,710
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#21
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#415
of 17,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematical Biology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 17,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them