↓ Skip to main content

Association between inflammatory biomarkers and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer-related mortality

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
27 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between inflammatory biomarkers and all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer-related mortality
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, November 2016
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.160313
Pubmed ID
Authors

Archana Singh-Manoux, Martin J. Shipley, Joshua A. Bell, Marianne Canonico, Alexis Elbaz, Mika Kivimäki

Abstract

The inflammatory biomarker α1-acid glycoprotein (AGP) was found to have the strongest association with 5-year mortality in a recent study of 106 biomarkers. We examined whether AGP is a better biomarker of mortality risk than the more widely used inflammatory biomarkers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP). We analyzed data for 6545 men and women aged 45-69 (mean 55.7) years from the Whitehall II cohort study. We assayed AGP, IL-6 and CRP levels from fasting serum samples collected in 1997-1999. Mortality follow-up was until June 2015. Cox regression analysis was used to model associations of inflammatory biomarkers with all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer-related mortality. Over the mean follow-up of 16.7 years, 736 deaths occurred, of which 181 were from cardiovascular disease and 347 from cancer. In the model adjusted for all covariates (age, sex, socioeconomic status, body mass index, health behaviours and chronic disease), AGP did not predict mortality beyond the first 5 years of follow-up; over this period, IL-6 and CRP had stronger associations with mortality. When we considered all covariates and biomarkers simultaneously, AGP no longer predicted all-cause mortality over the entire follow-up period (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.90-1.08). Only IL-6 predicted all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33) and cancer-related mortality (adjusted HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.00-1.29) over the entire follow-up period, whereas CRP predicted only cardiovascular mortality (adjusted HR 1.30, 95% CI 1.06-1.61). Our findings suggest that AGP is not a better marker of short- or long-term mortality risk than the more commonly used biomarkers IL-6 and CRP.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Student > Master 12 22%
Researcher 6 11%
Other 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 225. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2017.
All research outputs
#172,628
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#312
of 9,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,535
of 422,177 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#5
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,534 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,177 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.