↓ Skip to main content

The effects of performance status one week before hospital admission on the outcomes of critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
The effects of performance status one week before hospital admission on the outcomes of critically ill patients
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4563-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fernando G. Zampieri, Fernando A. Bozza, Giulliana M. Moralez, Débora D. S. Mazza, Alexandre V. Scotti, Marcelo S. Santino, Rubens A. B. Ribeiro, Edison M. Rodrigues Filho, Maurício M. Cabral, Marcelo O. Maia, Patrícia S. D’Alessandro, Sandro V. Oliveira, Márcia A. M. Menezes, Eliana B. Caser, Roberto S. Lannes, Meton S. Alencar Neto, Maristela M. Machado, Marcelo F. Sousa, Jorge I. F. Salluh, Marcio Soares

Abstract

To assess the impact of performance status (PS) impairment 1 week before hospital admission on the outcomes in patients admitted to intensive care units (ICU). Retrospective cohort study in 59,693 patients (medical admissions, 67 %) admitted to 78 ICUs during 2013. We classified PS impairment according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale in absent/minor (PS = 0-1), moderate (PS = 2) or severe (PS = 3-4). We used univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to investigate the association between PS impairment and hospital mortality. PS impairment was moderate in 17.3 % and severe in 6.9 % of patients. The hospital mortality was 14.4 %. Overall, the worse the PS, the higher the ICU and hospital mortality and length of stay. In addition, patients with worse PS were less frequently discharged home. PS impairment was associated with worse outcomes in all SAPS 3, Charlson Comorbidity Index and age quartiles as well as according to the admission type. Adjusting for other relevant clinical characteristics, PS impairment was associated with higher hospital mortality (odds-ratio (OR) = 1.96 (95 % CI 1.63-2.35), for moderate and OR = 4.22 (3.32-5.35), for severe impairment). The effects of PS on the outcome were particularly relevant in the medium range of severity-of-illness. These results were consistent in the subgroup analyses. However, adding PS impairment to the SAPS 3 score improved only slightly its discriminative capability. PS impairment was associated with worse outcomes independently of other markers of chronic health status, particularly for patients in the medium range of severity of illness.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Researcher 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Professor 6 9%
Student > Master 4 6%
Other 14 21%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 43%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 1%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 22 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2019.
All research outputs
#2,188,315
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,705
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,097
of 330,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#25
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.