↓ Skip to main content

Is the Pro-Poor Premium Exemption Policy of Ghana’s NHIS Reducing Disparities Among the Elderly?

Overview of attention for article published in Population Research and Policy Review, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Is the Pro-Poor Premium Exemption Policy of Ghana’s NHIS Reducing Disparities Among the Elderly?
Published in
Population Research and Policy Review, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11113-016-9420-2
Authors

Vincent Z. Kuuire, Eric Y. Tenkorang, Andrea Rishworth, Isaac Luginaah, Alfred E. Yawson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 14 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2017.
All research outputs
#7,592,412
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Population Research and Policy Review
#311
of 657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,927
of 422,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Population Research and Policy Review
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.