↓ Skip to main content

Interspecies comparison of peptide substrate reporter metabolism using compartment-based modeling

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Interspecies comparison of peptide substrate reporter metabolism using compartment-based modeling
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00216-016-0085-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison J. Tierney, Nhat Pham, Kunwei Yang, Brooks K. Emerick, Michelle L. Kovarik

Abstract

Peptide substrate reporters are fluorescently labeled peptides that can be acted upon by one or more enzymes of interest. Peptide substrates are readily synthesized and more easily separated than full-length protein substrates; however, they are often more rapidly degraded by peptidases. As a result, peptide reporters must be made resistant to proteolysis in order to study enzymes in intact cells and lysates. This is typically achieved by optimizing the reporter sequence in a single cell type or model organism, but studies of reporter stability in a variety of organisms are needed to establish the robustness and broader utility of these molecular tools. We measured peptidase activity toward a peptide substrate reporter for protein kinase B (Akt) in E. coli, D. discoideum, and S. cerevisiae using capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence (CE-LIF). Using compartment-based modeling, we determined individual rate constants for all potential peptidase reactions and explored how these rate constants differed between species. We found the reporter to be stable in D. discoideum (t 1/2 = 82-103 min) and S. cerevisiae (t 1/2 = 279-314 min), but less stable in E. coli (t 1/2 = 21-44 min). These data suggest that the reporter is sufficiently stable to be used for kinase assays in eukaryotic cell types while also demonstrating the potential utility of compartment-based models in peptide substrate reporter design. Graphical abstract Cell lysates from several evolutionarily divergent species were incubated with a peptide substrate reporter, and compartment-based modeling was used to determine key steps in the metabolism of the reporter in each cell type.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 38%
Student > Master 2 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 1 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 25%
Chemistry 2 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#6,060
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,072
of 416,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#70
of 190 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 190 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.