You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New MR Imaging Assessment Tool to Define Brain Abnormalities in Very Preterm Infants at Term
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a3521 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
H. Kidokoro, J.J. Neil, T.E. Inder |
| Abstract |
WM injury is the dominant form of injury in preterm infants. However, other cerebral structures, including the deep gray matter and the cerebellum, can also be affected by injury and/or impaired growth. Current MR imaging injury assessment scales are subjective and are challenging to apply. Thus, we developed a new assessment tool and applied it to MR imaging studies obtained from very preterm infants at term age. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 252 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 16% |
| Researcher | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 31 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 68 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 83 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 12% |
| Psychology | 12 | 5% |
| Engineering | 9 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 97 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2022.
All research outputs
#6,404,667
of 25,779,988 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#1,493
of 5,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,775
of 206,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#16
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,779,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,919 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.