↓ Skip to main content

Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Science, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
292 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Education Enhances the Acuity of the Nonverbal Approximate Number System
Published in
Psychological Science, April 2013
DOI 10.1177/0956797612464057
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela Piazza, Pierre Pica, Véronique Izard, Elizabeth S. Spelke, Stanislas Dehaene

Abstract

All humans share a universal, evolutionarily ancient approximate number system (ANS) that estimates and combines the numbers of objects in sets with ratio-limited precision. Interindividual variability in the acuity of the ANS correlates with mathematical achievement, but the causes of this correlation have never been established. We acquired psychophysical measures of ANS acuity in child and adult members of an indigene group in the Amazon, the Mundurucú, who have a very restricted numerical lexicon and highly variable access to mathematics education. By comparing Mundurucú subjects with and without access to schooling, we found that education significantly enhances the acuity with which sets of concrete objects are estimated. These results indicate that culture and education have an important effect on basic number perception. We hypothesize that symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical thinking mutually enhance one another over the course of mathematics instruction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 292 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 3%
United Kingdom 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Hungary 2 <1%
South Africa 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 272 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 29%
Researcher 52 18%
Student > Master 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 27 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 46 16%
Unknown 30 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 167 57%
Social Sciences 20 7%
Neuroscience 20 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 5%
Linguistics 6 2%
Other 18 6%
Unknown 46 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,076,127
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Science
#3,138
of 4,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,696
of 194,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Science
#87
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 80.6. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.