↓ Skip to main content

Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Surgery, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Toward More Efficient Surveillance of Barrett’s Esophagus: Identification and Exclusion of Patients at Low Risk of Cancer
Published in
World Journal of Surgery, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00268-016-3819-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mats Lindblad, Tim Bright, Ann Schloithe, George C. Mayne, Gang Chen, Jeff Bull, Peter A. Bampton, Robert J. L. Fraser, Piers A. Gatenby, Louisa G. Gordon, David I. Watson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 18%
Researcher 3 18%
Librarian 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 3 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 18%
Social Sciences 2 12%
Psychology 1 6%
Unspecified 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 2 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,212,576
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#480
of 4,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,885
of 415,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#19
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,238 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.