| Title |
Large-Eddy Simulations of Dust Devils and Convective Vortices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Space Science Reviews, September 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11214-016-0284-x |
| Authors |
Aymeric Spiga, Erika Barth, Zhaolin Gu, Fabian Hoffmann, Junshi Ito, Bradley Jemmett-Smith, Martina Klose, Seiya Nishizawa, Siegfried Raasch, Scot Rafkin, Tetsuya Takemi, Daniel Tyler, Wei Wei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 44% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 8 | 30% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 7 | 26% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,288,129
of 24,579,513 outputs
Outputs from Space Science Reviews
#376
of 1,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,812
of 329,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Space Science Reviews
#6
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,579,513 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,170 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.