| Title |
Editorial: Folk Epistemology. The Cognitive Bases of Epistemic Evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Review of Philosophy and Psychology, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s13164-010-0046-8 |
| Authors |
Christophe Heintz, Dario Taraborelli |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 22% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 41% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 19% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#4,701,828
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#116
of 426 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,080
of 180,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Review of Philosophy and Psychology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 426 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them