↓ Skip to main content

Presymptomatic diagnosis of Fabry’s disease: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Presymptomatic diagnosis of Fabry’s disease: a case report
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, November 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13256-016-1124-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rasmus Bo Hasselbalch, Per Lav Madsen, Henning Bundgaard, Juliane Theilade

Abstract

Fabry's disease is a rare X-linked genetic disorder characterized by reduced levels of the α-galactosidase A enzyme. It may present with a cardiac phenotype resembling hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. However, as a specific enzyme replacement therapy is available, it remains an important differential diagnoses in patients presenting with cardiac hypertrophy. In boys, onset has been reported in early childhood with complaints initially comprising neuropathic pain, reduced sweat production, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Later the cardiac, renal, and central nervous systems may become affected. Female mutation carriers may remain asymptomatic or present at a later age with varying symptoms and clinical manifestations due to random inactivation of the X chromosome in different organs. Here we present a case of Fabry's disease diagnosed in the daughter of an elderly, Caucasian woman (81 years old) with late-onset cardiac conduction disease and heart failure. We discuss the implications of cascade screening relatives of elderly probands. Irrespective of the patient's age, physicians must be on the lookout for phenocopies when identifying patients with possibly inheritable cardiomyopathies. The specific - precise - diagnosis may be crucial for the patient as well as the relatives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 20%
Student > Bachelor 4 16%
Other 2 8%
Librarian 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 4 16%
Unknown 6 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 4 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 8%
Neuroscience 2 8%
Other 5 20%
Unknown 7 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2017.
All research outputs
#13,796,561
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#995
of 3,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#214,217
of 416,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#19
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,934 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.