↓ Skip to main content

Investigation of reinforcing effects and central nervous system effects by drug self-administration procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, January 2005
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Investigation of reinforcing effects and central nervous system effects by drug self-administration procedures
Published in
Folia Pharmacologica Japonica, January 2005
DOI 10.1254/fpj.126.5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yoshio Wakasa, Mikio Sasaki, Atsushi Fujiwara, Masahiko Iino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#12,875,786
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#491
of 783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,994
of 139,399 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Folia Pharmacologica Japonica
#8
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 783 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,399 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.