↓ Skip to main content

Economic costs of overweight and obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic costs of overweight and obesity
Published in
Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.beem.2013.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Lehnert, Diana Sonntag, Alexander Konnopka, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Hans-Helmut König

Abstract

Obesity has substantially increased in recent decades and is now one of the major global health problems. The large obesity-related health burden negatively impacts many relevant health outcomes (e.g. quality of life, disability, mortality) and leads to increased healthcare utilization. This excess service use is the main driver behind high healthcare costs of obese individuals. Findings indicate that costs rise curvilinearly with increasing body mass index, especially among the obese. As more individuals of a country's population become obese, a larger share of total annual national healthcare expenditure is spent on obesity and obesity-related health problems. In addition to escalating healthcare costs, obesity goes along with indirect costs through decreases in workforce productivity. The empirical evidence has shown beyond doubt that obesity negatively impacts individuals, healthcare systems, employers, and the economy as a whole. This article provides a brief overview of selected economic consequences associated with excess-weight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 495 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 19%
Student > Bachelor 76 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 13%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 6%
Other 92 18%
Unknown 97 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 8%
Social Sciences 37 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 5%
Other 115 23%
Unknown 119 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#1,928,602
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
#56
of 802 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,898
of 205,945 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 802 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,945 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.