↓ Skip to main content

Economic costs of overweight and obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
6 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
228 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
509 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic costs of overweight and obesity
Published in
Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, February 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.beem.2013.01.002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Lehnert, Diana Sonntag, Alexander Konnopka, Steffi Riedel-Heller, Hans-Helmut König

Abstract

Obesity has substantially increased in recent decades and is now one of the major global health problems. The large obesity-related health burden negatively impacts many relevant health outcomes (e.g. quality of life, disability, mortality) and leads to increased healthcare utilization. This excess service use is the main driver behind high healthcare costs of obese individuals. Findings indicate that costs rise curvilinearly with increasing body mass index, especially among the obese. As more individuals of a country's population become obese, a larger share of total annual national healthcare expenditure is spent on obesity and obesity-related health problems. In addition to escalating healthcare costs, obesity goes along with indirect costs through decreases in workforce productivity. The empirical evidence has shown beyond doubt that obesity negatively impacts individuals, healthcare systems, employers, and the economy as a whole. This article provides a brief overview of selected economic consequences associated with excess-weight.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 509 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Chile 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 495 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 96 19%
Student > Bachelor 76 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 67 13%
Researcher 49 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 6%
Other 92 18%
Unknown 97 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 68 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 8%
Social Sciences 37 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 26 5%
Other 115 23%
Unknown 119 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,849,863
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
#56
of 803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,158
of 205,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 205,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.