Title |
Influence of platelet and white blood cell counts on major thrombosis – analysis from a patient registry in essential thrombocythemia
|
---|---|
Published in |
European Journal of Haematology, May 2016
|
DOI | 10.1111/ejh.12759 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Veronika Buxhofer‐Ausch, Michael Steurer, Siegfried Sormann, Ernst Schloegl, Wolfgang Schimetta, Bettina Gisslinger, Reinhard Ruckser, Günther Gastl, Heinz Gisslinger |
Abstract |
Although guidelines recommend normalization of platelet counts as an appropriate endpoint for treatment in high-risk essential thrombocythemia (ET), retrospective studies could not prove a correlation of diagnostic platelet counts with an increased thrombotic rate. There is, however, an increasing evidence that leukocytosis is an important risk factor for arterial thrombosis in myeloproliferative neoplasms. The current study considers the Austrian cohort of a European registry regarding the platelet-lowering therapeutic anagrelide. Influence of platelet and white blood cell (WBC) counts on thrombotic risk was assessed. By using the calculated cut-offs of 574.5 G/L for platelets and 8.48 G/L for WBC counts, respectively, the Cox regression analysis revealed a clear influence of elevated platelets (p= 0.008) and WBC counts (p= 0.011) on the occurrence of major thrombotic events. The time to a major thrombotic event was shortest (p< 0.001) and the frequency related to 100 patient years was highest (p=<0.001) when both platelet and WBC counts ranged above the calculated cut-offs. Our data add evidence to the impact of platelet and WBC counts on thrombosis in ET. We suspect a particular interaction between platelets and WBC which might be based on a biological interplay depending on particular cell counts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 24% |
Other | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 52% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Psychology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 8 | 28% |