| Title |
Developing a video game metadata schema for the Seattle Interactive Media Museum
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal on Digital Libraries, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00799-013-0103-x |
| Authors |
Jin Ha Lee, Joseph T. Tennis, Rachel Ivy Clarke, Michael Carpenter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 22 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Librarian | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 12 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 21 | 29% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 21% |
| Arts and Humanities | 9 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Design | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 16 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2013.
All research outputs
#20,191,579
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#223
of 229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,023
of 194,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal on Digital Libraries
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.