↓ Skip to main content

Does cognitive behaviour therapy have an enduring effect that is superior to keeping patients on continuation pharmacotherapy? A meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
39 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
52 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
209 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does cognitive behaviour therapy have an enduring effect that is superior to keeping patients on continuation pharmacotherapy? A meta-analysis
Published in
BMJ Open, April 2013
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002542
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pim Cuijpers, Steven D Hollon, Annemieke van Straten, Claudi Bockting, Matthias Berking, Gerhard Andersson

Abstract

Although cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) and pharmacotherapy are equally effective in the acute treatment of adult depression, it is not known how they compare across the longer term. In this meta-analysis, we compared the effects of acute phase CBT without any subsequent treatment with the effects of pharmacotherapy that either were continued or discontinued across 6-18 months of follow-up.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Dominican Republic 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 325 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 52 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Master 45 14%
Researcher 43 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 59 18%
Unknown 64 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 151 45%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 12%
Neuroscience 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 4%
Social Sciences 12 4%
Other 20 6%
Unknown 81 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 350. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2024.
All research outputs
#93,327
of 25,506,250 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#183
of 25,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#541
of 206,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#4
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,506,250 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,724 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.