↓ Skip to main content

The effect of increasing lifespan and recycling rate on carbon storage in wood products from theoretical model to application for the European wood sector

Overview of attention for article published in Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 777)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
86 Mendeley
Title
The effect of increasing lifespan and recycling rate on carbon storage in wood products from theoretical model to application for the European wood sector
Published in
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11027-016-9722-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pau Brunet-Navarro, Hubert Jochheim, Bart Muys

Abstract

The use of wood products is often promoted as a climate change mitigation option to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. In previous literature, we identified longevity and recycling rate as two determining factors that influence the carbon stock in wood products, but no studies have predicted the effect of improved wood use on carbon storage over time. In this study, we aimed at evaluating changes in the lifespan and the recycling rate as two options for enhancing carbon stock in wood products for different time horizons. We first explored the behaviour over time of both factors in a theoretical simulation, and then calculated their effect for the European wood sector of the future. The theoretical simulation shows that the carbon stock in wood products increases linearly when increasing the average lifespan of wood products and exponentially when improving the recycling rate. The emissions savings under the current use of wood products in Europe in 2030 were estimated at 57.65 Mt carbon dioxide (CO2) per year. This amount could be increased 5 Mt CO2 if average lifespan increased 19.54 % or if recycling rate increased 20.92 % in 2017. However, the combination of both strategies could increase the emissions saving almost 5 Mt CO2 more by 2030. Incrementing recycling rate of paper and paperboard is the best short-term strategy (2030) to reduce emissions, but elongating average lifespan of wood-based panels is a better strategy for longer term periods (2046).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 86 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 15%
Researcher 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Professor 4 5%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 31 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 15 17%
Engineering 11 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 5%
Materials Science 2 2%
Other 11 13%
Unknown 36 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#789,084
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#16
of 777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,793
of 343,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them