↓ Skip to main content

Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#49 of 2,706)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
70 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
265 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Active inference, enactivism and the hermeneutics of social cognition
Published in
Synthese, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11229-016-1269-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaun Gallagher, Micah Allen

Abstract

We distinguish between three philosophical views on the neuroscience of predictive models: predictive coding (associated with internal Bayesian models and prediction error minimization), predictive processing (associated with radical connectionism and 'simple' embodiment) and predictive engagement (associated with enactivist approaches to cognition). We examine the concept of active inference under each model and then ask how this concept informs discussions of social cognition. In this context we consider Frith and Friston's proposal for a neural hermeneutics, and we explore the alternative model of enactivist hermeneutics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 265 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 261 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Researcher 43 16%
Student > Master 42 16%
Student > Bachelor 19 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Other 49 18%
Unknown 39 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 22%
Philosophy 34 13%
Neuroscience 34 13%
Social Sciences 19 7%
Arts and Humanities 15 6%
Other 53 20%
Unknown 52 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#955,976
of 25,303,733 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#49
of 2,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,443
of 429,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,303,733 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.