| Title |
On the Risks of Relying on Analogies to Understand Cyber Conflicts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Minds and Machines, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11023-016-9408-z |
| Authors |
Mariarosaria Taddeo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 86% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 10 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 18% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 12 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2019.
All research outputs
#3,995,347
of 24,739,153 outputs
Outputs from Minds and Machines
#71
of 330 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,457
of 425,424 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Minds and Machines
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,739,153 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 330 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,424 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.