You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consistency in large pharmacogenomic studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature19838 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Geeleher, Eric R. Gamazon, Cathal Seoighe, Nancy J. Cox, R. Stephanie Huang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Italy | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Egypt | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 9% |
| Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2020.
All research outputs
#1,797,809
of 24,187,394 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#40,224
of 94,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,724
of 423,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#656
of 901 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 94,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 101.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 901 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.