↓ Skip to main content

Economic Evaluation of 5-Grass Pollen Tablets Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in Adults

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Drug Investigation, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Economic Evaluation of 5-Grass Pollen Tablets Versus Placebo in the Treatment of Allergic Rhinitis in Adults
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation, March 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40261-013-0067-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matteo Ruggeri, Marco Oradei, Franco Frati, Paola Puccinelli, Cristina Romao, Ilaria Dell’Albani, Cristoforo Incorvaia, Americo Cicchetti

Abstract

Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is aimed at modifying the immune response to a causative allergen, thereby reducing clinical symptoms and symptomatic medication intake and improving quality of life. Long-term AIT research has led to the development of 5-grass pollen tablets, currently indicated for the treatment of grass pollen-induced allergic rhinitis (AR).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 49%
Computer Science 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,337,420
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#798
of 959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,196
of 197,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#7
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 959 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,840 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.