↓ Skip to main content

Ionic liquids and cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: limitation of the affinity capillary electrophoresis technique

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Ionic liquids and cyclodextrin inclusion complexes: limitation of the affinity capillary electrophoresis technique
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00216-016-9931-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nadine Mofaddel, Sophie Fourmentin, Fréderic Guillen, David Landy, Géraldine Gouhier

Abstract

The state of the art of inclusion complex formation between cyclodextrins and ionic liquids is reported. Mechanisms, stoichiometries, and binding constants are summarized and classified by anion. We investigated the supramolecular interactions between the β-cyclodextrin cavity and six ionic liquids based on 1-dodecyl-3-methylimidazolium by affinity capillary electrophoresis and compared the results with those obtained by isothermal titration calorimetry. We show that the presence of basic or acidic buffers leads to a metathesis reaction, underlining the limitation of the affinity capillary electrophoresis technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 4 22%
Unknown 4 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 8 44%
Engineering 2 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Unknown 6 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2016.
All research outputs
#22,834,739
of 25,461,852 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,570
of 9,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#287,045
of 327,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#108
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,461,852 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,646 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.