↓ Skip to main content

Fixed minimum fluid volume for resuscitation: Con

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, October 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
33 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Fixed minimum fluid volume for resuscitation: Con
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, October 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4581-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anders Perner, Mervyn Singer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 18%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Postgraduate 5 11%
Professor 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 9%
Other 10 23%
Unknown 8 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 70%
Unspecified 1 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,023,605
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,607
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,733
of 318,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#21
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.