| Title |
Don’t Cry for me “Argenchina”: Unraveling Political Views of China through Legislative Debates in Argentina
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Chinese Political Science, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11366-016-9450-y |
| Authors |
Francisco Urdinez, Jan Knoerich, Pedro Feliú Ribeiro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Spain | 2 | 20% |
| China | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Chile | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 16% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 12 | 32% |
| Engineering | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,117,730
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#34
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,694
of 417,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Chinese Political Science
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,674 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.