↓ Skip to main content

Reciprocal Family, Friendship and Church Support Networks of African Americans: Findings from the National Survey of American Life

Overview of attention for article published in Race and Social Problems, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Reciprocal Family, Friendship and Church Support Networks of African Americans: Findings from the National Survey of American Life
Published in
Race and Social Problems, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s12552-016-9186-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert Joseph Taylor, Dawne M. Mouzon, Ann W. Nguyen, Linda M. Chatters

Abstract

This study examined reciprocal support networks involving extended family, friends and church members among African Americans. Our analysis examined specific patterns of reciprocal support (i.e., received only, gave only, both gave and received, neither gave or received), as well as network characteristics (i.e., contact and subjective closeness) as correlates of reciprocal support. The analysis is based on the African American sub-sample of the National Survey of American Life (NSAL). Overall, our findings indicate that African Americans are very involved in reciprocal support networks with their extended family, friends and church members. Respondents were most extensively involved in reciprocal supports with extended family members, followed closely by friends and church networks. Network characteristics (i.e., contact and subjective closeness) were significantly and consistently associated with involvement with reciprocal support exchanges for all three networks. These and other findings are discussed in detail. This study complements previous work on the complementary roles of family, friend and congregational support networks, as well as studies of racial differences in informal support networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 36%
Student > Master 3 11%
Lecturer 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 5 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 9 32%
Psychology 6 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 6 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2022.
All research outputs
#2,433,018
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Race and Social Problems
#74
of 252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,725
of 314,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Race and Social Problems
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.