↓ Skip to main content

Associations between Cultural Stressors, Cultural Values, and Latina/o College Students’ Mental Health

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
Title
Associations between Cultural Stressors, Cultural Values, and Latina/o College Students’ Mental Health
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, November 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10964-016-0600-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalie Corona, Vivian M. Rodríguez, Shelby E. McDonald, Efren Velazquez, Adriana Rodríguez, Vanessa E. Fuentes

Abstract

Latina/o college students experience cultural stressors that negatively impact their mental health, which places them at risk for academic problems. We explored whether cultural values buffer the negative effect of cultural stressors on mental health symptoms in a sample of 198 Latina/o college students (70 % female; 43 % first generation college students). Bivariate results revealed significant positive associations between cultural stressors (i.e., acculturative stress, discrimination) and mental health symptoms (i.e., anxiety, depressive, psychological stress), and negative associations between cultural values of familismo, respeto, and religiosity and mental health symptoms. Several cultural values moderated the influence of cultural stressors on mental health symptoms. The findings highlight the importance of helping Latina/o college students remain connected to their families and cultural values as a way of promoting their mental health.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 188 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 18%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 14%
Student > Master 20 11%
Researcher 13 7%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 50 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 35%
Social Sciences 31 16%
Arts and Humanities 8 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2017.
All research outputs
#13,558,274
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#1,129
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,271
of 314,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#18
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.