↓ Skip to main content

Reassessment of teratogenic risk from antenatal ultrasound

Overview of attention for article published in Translational Neuroscience, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
Title
Reassessment of teratogenic risk from antenatal ultrasound
Published in
Translational Neuroscience, March 2013
DOI 10.2478/s13380-013-0112-7
Authors

Emily Williams, Manuel Casanova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 1 20%
Lecturer 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Physics and Astronomy 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,489,487
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Translational Neuroscience
#118
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,780
of 208,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Translational Neuroscience
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.