↓ Skip to main content

Dam and wet-screened concrete creep in compression: in situ experimental results and creep strains prediction using model B3 and composite models

Overview of attention for article published in Materials and Structures, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
Title
Dam and wet-screened concrete creep in compression: in situ experimental results and creep strains prediction using model B3 and composite models
Published in
Materials and Structures, February 2016
DOI 10.1617/s11527-016-0828-2
Authors

C. Serra, A. L. Batista, N. Monteiro Azevedo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 21%
Researcher 2 14%
Other 1 7%
Professor 1 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 43%
Chemistry 1 7%
Mathematics 1 7%
Unknown 6 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Materials and Structures
#297
of 325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,352
of 297,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials and Structures
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 325 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 297,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.