↓ Skip to main content

Understanding circulatory failure in sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
Title
Understanding circulatory failure in sepsis
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00134-016-4514-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Bloch, David Berger, Jukka Takala

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
Czechia 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 10 15%
Other 9 13%
Researcher 9 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 17 25%
Unknown 11 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 70%
Unspecified 2 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2017.
All research outputs
#2,575,316
of 25,498,750 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,864
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,202
of 331,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#22
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,498,750 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.