↓ Skip to main content

Eukaryotic Membranes and Cytoskeleton

Overview of attention for book
Attention for Chapter 5: Eukaryotic Membranes and Cytoskeleton
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Eukaryotic Membranes and Cytoskeleton
Chapter number 5
Book title
Eukaryotic Membranes and Cytoskeleton
Published in
Advances in experimental medicine and biology, January 2007
DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-74021-8_5
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-0-387-74020-1, 978-0-387-74021-8
Authors

Mironov, Alexander A, Banin, Victor V, Sesorova, Irina S, Dolgikh, Viacheslav V, Luini, Alberto, Beznoussenko, Galina V, Alexander A. Mironov, Victor V. Banin, Irina S. Sesorova, Viacheslav V. Dolgikh, Alberto Luini, Galina V. Beznoussenko, Mironov, Alexander A., Banin, Victor V., Sesorova, Irina S., Dolgikh, Viacheslav V., Beznoussenko, Galina V.

Abstract

By analyzing the morpho-physiological features of the Golgi complex, its relationship with the endoplasmic reticulum in different species, and the molecular machineries involved in intracellular transport, we conclude that; (1) all eukaryotic cells have either Golgi complexes or remnants thereof; (2) all eukaryotic cells have a large minimal set of proteins that are involved in intracellular transport; and (3) several indispensable molecular machines are always present in secreting eukaryotic cells. Using this information, our data about mechanisms of intra-Golgi transport and phylogenetic analysis of several molecular machines, we propose a model for the evolution of the Golgi complex and the endoplasmic reticulum.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 5%
Unknown 21 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 18%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 27%
Neuroscience 1 5%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,724,156
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#808
of 4,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,232
of 157,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in experimental medicine and biology
#13
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.