↓ Skip to main content

Potent α-amylase inhibitory activity of Indian Ayurvedic medicinal plants

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
229 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
Title
Potent α-amylase inhibitory activity of Indian Ayurvedic medicinal plants
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, January 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-11-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sudha P, Smita S Zinjarde, Shobha Y Bhargava, Ameeta R Kumar

Abstract

Indian medicinal plants used in the Ayurvedic traditional system to treat diabetes are a valuable source of novel anti-diabetic agents. Pancreatic α-amylase inhibitors offer an effective strategy to lower the levels of post-prandial hyperglycemia via control of starch breakdown. In this study, seventeen Indian medicinal plants with known hypoglycemic properties were subjected to sequential solvent extraction and tested for α-amylase inhibition, in order to assess and evaluate their inhibitory potential on PPA (porcine pancreatic α-amylase). Preliminary phytochemical analysis of the lead extracts was performed in order to determine the probable constituents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 5 <1%
United States 3 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 584 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 97 16%
Student > Master 65 11%
Student > Bachelor 63 10%
Researcher 59 10%
Student > Postgraduate 28 5%
Other 114 19%
Unknown 175 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 148 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 54 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 50 8%
Chemistry 38 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 37 6%
Other 75 12%
Unknown 199 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#2,035
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,282
of 182,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.