↓ Skip to main content

Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Social context influences recognition of bodily expressions
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, April 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2220-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mariska Esther Kret, Beatrice de Gelder

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that recognition of facial expressions is influenced by the affective information provided by the surrounding scene. The goal of this study was to investigate whether similar effects could be obtained for bodily expressions. Images of emotional body postures were briefly presented as part of social scenes showing either neutral or emotional group actions. In Experiment 1, fearful and happy bodies were presented in fearful, happy, neutral and scrambled contexts. In Experiment 2, we compared happy with angry body expressions. In Experiment 3 and 4, we blurred the facial expressions of all people in the scene. This way, we were able to ascribe possible scene effects to the presence of body expressions visible in the scene and we were able to measure the contribution of facial expressions to the body expression recognition. In all experiments, we observed an effect of social scene context. Bodily expressions were better recognized when the actions in the scenes expressed an emotion congruent with the bodily expression of the target figure. The specific influence of facial expressions in the scene was dependent on the emotional expression but did not necessarily increase the congruency effect. Taken together, the results show that the social context influences our recognition of a person's bodily expression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Netherlands 3 2%
Canada 2 1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 138 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 25%
Researcher 29 19%
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 25 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 73 48%
Neuroscience 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Computer Science 7 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 33 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#6,670,514
of 25,182,110 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#649
of 3,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,593
of 100,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#9
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,182,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.