| Title |
Nationally Representative Plot Network Reveals Contrasting Drivers of Net Biomass Change in Secondary and Old-Growth Forests
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-016-0084-x |
| Authors |
Robert J. Holdaway, Tomás A. Easdale, Fiona E. Carswell, Sarah J. Richardson, Duane A. Peltzer, Norman W. H. Mason, Andrea M. Brandon, David A. Coomes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 23% |
| Researcher | 13 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 18 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 23 | 35% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2021.
All research outputs
#1,802,661
of 25,130,202 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#125
of 1,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,462
of 428,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,130,202 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,668 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.