↓ Skip to main content

Mevlana Jalāl-ad-Dīn Rumi and Mindfulness

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Religion and Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
Title
Mevlana Jalāl-ad-Dīn Rumi and Mindfulness
Published in
Journal of Religion and Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1007/s10943-010-9430-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gretty M. Mirdal

Abstract

The use of mindfulness-related methods for the treatment of a variety of psychological, somatic and interpersonal problems has increased dramatically in the last decade. Almost all mindfulness-based therapies include the practice of meditation in addition to various cognitive and/or behavioral techniques. The source of inspiration for mindfulness has traditionally been Buddhism, while Islamic thought has not been present in this development despite the similarities in philosophy and a growing need for mental health support among Muslim populations throughout the world. It is in this context that Sufism and especially Rumi's teachings seem to be promising both in terms of research on consciousness and in terms of culturally sensitive methods of healing. The aim of the present article is to highlight the commonality of mindfulness-based therapies and Rumi's religious philosophy. Introducing concepts, images and metaphors based on Rumi's universe can constitute a meaningful alternative to Buddhist-inspired practices in the transcultural clinic, especially in encounters with clients with Muslim background.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Bangladesh 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 170 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Researcher 11 6%
Other 42 24%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 34%
Social Sciences 24 14%
Arts and Humanities 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 3%
Other 25 14%
Unknown 43 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,890,004
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Religion and Health
#157
of 1,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,182
of 185,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Religion and Health
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,708 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.