You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cancer Risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results From Prospective Analysis of EMBRACE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jnci/djt095 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nasim Mavaddat, Susan Peock, Debra Frost, Steve Ellis, Radka Platte, Elena Fineberg, D. Gareth Evans, Louise Izatt, Rosalind A. Eeles, Julian Adlard, Rosemarie Davidson, Diana Eccles, Trevor Cole, Jackie Cook, Carole Brewer, Marc Tischkowitz, Fiona Douglas, Shirley Hodgson, Lisa Walker, Mary E. Porteous, Patrick J. Morrison, Lucy E. Side, M. John Kennedy, Catherine Houghton, Alan Donaldson, Mark T. Rogers, Huw Dorkins, Zosia Miedzybrodzka, Helen Gregory, Jacqueline Eason, Julian Barwell, Emma McCann, Alex Murray, Antonis C. Antoniou, Douglas F. Easton |
| Abstract |
Reliable estimates of cancer risk are critical for guiding management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The aims of this study were to derive penetrance estimates for breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and contralateral breast cancer in a prospective series of mutation carriers and to assess how these risks are modified by common breast cancer susceptibility alleles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 630 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| Uruguay | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 620 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 98 | 16% |
| Researcher | 87 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 77 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 60 | 10% |
| Other | 48 | 8% |
| Other | 104 | 17% |
| Unknown | 156 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 188 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 105 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 83 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 3% |
| Psychology | 9 | 1% |
| Other | 43 | 7% |
| Unknown | 182 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#2,186,831
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#1,455
of 7,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,763
of 208,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
#14
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,378 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.