You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correlation of MRI-Derived Apparent Diffusion Coefficients in Newly Diagnosed Gliomas with [18F]-Fluoro-L-Dopa PET: What Are We Really Measuring with Minimum ADC?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Neuroradiology, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3174/ajnr.a3315 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
S. Rose, M. Fay, P. Thomas, P. Bourgeat, N. Dowson, O. Salvado, Y. Gal, A. Coulthard, S. Crozier |
| Abstract |
There is significant interest in whether diffusion-weighted MR imaging indices, such as the minimum apparent diffusion coefficient, may be useful clinically for preoperative tumor grading and treatment planning. To help establish the pathologic correlate of minimum ADC, we undertook a study investigating the relationship between minimum ADC and maximum FDOPA PET uptake in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 56 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 12 | 21% |
| Unknown | 9 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 44% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 9% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2013.
All research outputs
#18,337,420
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#4,139
of 4,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,353
of 175,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Neuroradiology
#30
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.