↓ Skip to main content

Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia: New Pharmacotherapeutic Developments and Future Directions

Overview of attention for article published in Drugs, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Pediatric Relapsed or Refractory Leukemia: New Pharmacotherapeutic Developments and Future Directions
Published in
Drugs, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s40265-013-0026-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Keith J. August, Aru Narendran, Kathleen A. Neville

Abstract

Over the past 50 years, numerous advances in treatment have produced dramatic increases in the cure rates of pediatric leukemias. Despite this progress, the majority of children with relapsed leukemia are not expected to survive. With current chemotherapy regimens, approximately 15 % of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 45 % of children with acute myeloid leukemia will have refractory disease or experience a relapse. Advances in the treatment of pediatric relapsed leukemia have not mirrored the successes of upfront therapy, and newer treatments are desperately needed in order to improve survival in these challenging patients. Recent improvements in our knowledge of cancer biology have revealed an extensive number of targets that have the potential to be exploited for anticancer therapy. These advances have led to the development of a number of new treatments that are now being explored in children with relapsed or refractory leukemia. Novel agents seek to exploit the same molecular aberrations that contribute to leukemia development and resistance to therapy. Newer classes of drugs, including monoclonal antibodies, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and epigenetic modifiers are transforming the treatment of patients who are not cured with conventional therapies. As the side effects of many new agents are distinct from those seen with conventional chemotherapy, these treatments are often explored in combination with each other or combined with conventional treatment regimens. This review discusses the biological rationale for the most promising new agents and the results of recent studies conducted in pediatric patients with relapsed leukemia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Other 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Master 5 12%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2013.
All research outputs
#15,270,698
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Drugs
#2,790
of 3,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124,595
of 199,332 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drugs
#24
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,332 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.