↓ Skip to main content

Archival Isolates Confirm a Single Topotype of West Nile Virus in Australia

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Archival Isolates Confirm a Single Topotype of West Nile Virus in Australia
Published in
PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases, December 2016
DOI 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bixing Huang, Natalie A Prow, Andrew F. van den Hurk, Richard J. N. Allcock, Peter R. Moore, Stephen L. Doggett, David Warrilow

Abstract

West Nile virus is globally wide-spread and causes significant disease in humans and animals. The evolution of West Nile virus Kunjin subtype in Australia (WNVKUN) was investigated using archival samples collected over a period of 50 years. Based on the pattern of fixed amino acid substitutions and time-stamped molecular clock analyses, a single long-term lineage (or topotype) was inferred. This implies that a bottleneck exists such that regional strains eventually die out and are replaced with strains from a single source. This was consistent with current hypotheses regarding the distribution of WNVKUN, whereby the virus is enzootic in northern Australia and is disseminated to southern states by water-birds or mosquitoes after flooding associated with above average rainfall. In addition, two previous amino acid changes associated with pathogenicity, an N-Y-S glycosylation motif in the envelope protein and a phenylalanine at amino acid 653 in the RNA polymerase, were both detected in all isolates collected since the 1980s. Changes primarily occurred due to stochastic drift. One fixed substitution each in NS3 and NS5, subtly changed the chemical environment of important functional groups, and may be involved in fine-tuning RNA synthesis. Understanding these evolutionary changes will help us to better understand events such as the emergence of the virulent strain in 2011.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 22%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 11%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 44%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 11%
Unknown 1 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#8,185
of 9,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#313,392
of 416,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases
#211
of 229 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 229 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.