You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development of Monocytes, Macrophages, and Dendritic Cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science, February 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1126/science.1178331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frederic Geissmann, Markus G. Manz, Steffen Jung, Michael H. Sieweke, Miriam Merad, Klaus Ley |
| Abstract |
Monocytes and macrophages are critical effectors and regulators of inflammation and the innate immune response, the immediate arm of the immune system. Dendritic cells initiate and regulate the highly pathogen-specific adaptive immune responses and are central to the development of immunologic memory and tolerance. Recent in vivo experimental approaches in the mouse have unveiled new aspects of the developmental and lineage relationships among these cell populations. Despite this, the origin and differentiation cues for many tissue macrophages, monocytes, and dendritic cell subsets in mice, and the corresponding cell populations in humans, remain to be elucidated. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 17% |
| Philippines | 3 | 7% |
| Spain | 3 | 7% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 76% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 21% |
| Scientists | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3,545 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 47 | 1% |
| Germany | 21 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 18 | <1% |
| Brazil | 11 | <1% |
| Spain | 9 | <1% |
| Japan | 8 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 7 | <1% |
| France | 7 | <1% |
| India | 7 | <1% |
| Other | 53 | 1% |
| Unknown | 3357 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 932 | 26% |
| Researcher | 611 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 438 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 397 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 220 | 6% |
| Other | 466 | 13% |
| Unknown | 481 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1248 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 538 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 445 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 425 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 74 | 2% |
| Other | 274 | 8% |
| Unknown | 541 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,134,868
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Science
#20,359
of 83,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,640
of 179,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#56
of 347 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 347 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.