↓ Skip to main content

Focussing both eyes on health outcomes: revisiting cataract surgery

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Focussing both eyes on health outcomes: revisiting cataract surgery
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, September 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2318-12-50
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer C Davis, Heather McNeill, Michael Wasdell, Susan Chunick, Stirling Bryan

Abstract

The appropriateness of cataract surgery procedures has been questioned, the suggestion being that the surgery is sometimes undertaken too early in the disease progression. Our three study questions were: What is the level of visual impairment in patients scheduled for cataract surgery? What is the improvement following surgery? Given the thresholds for a minimal detectable change (MDC) and a minimal clinically important difference (MCID), do gains in visual function reach the MDC and MCID thresholds?

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 26%
Librarian 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 57%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 17%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Unknown 5 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,402,209
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#910
of 3,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,718
of 170,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.