| Title |
Factors affecting utilization of skilled maternal care in Northwest Ethiopia: a multilevel analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-698x-13-20 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abebaw Gebeyehu Worku, Alemayehu Worku Yalew, Mesganaw Fantahun Afework |
| Abstract |
The evaluation of all potential sources of low skilled maternal care utilization is crucial for Ethiopia. Previous studies have largely disregarded the contribution of different levels. This study was planned to assess the effect of individual, communal, and health facility characteristics in the utilization of antenatal, delivery, and postnatal care by a skilled provider. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| India | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 318 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Nigeria | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 314 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 86 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 11% |
| Researcher | 28 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 26 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 17 | 5% |
| Other | 57 | 18% |
| Unknown | 70 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 65 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 37 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 13 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 11% |
| Unknown | 82 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,169,949
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,305
of 17,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,391
of 209,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#208
of 310 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,607 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 310 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.