↓ Skip to main content

An imprinted rheumatoid arthritis methylome signature reflects pathogenic phenotype

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
An imprinted rheumatoid arthritis methylome signature reflects pathogenic phenotype
Published in
Genome Medicine, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/gm444
Pubmed ID
Authors

John W Whitaker, Robert Shoemaker, David L Boyle, Josh Hillman, David Anderson, Wei Wang, Gary S Firestein

Abstract

A DNA methylation signature has been characterized that distinguishes rheumatoid arthritis (RA) fibroblast like synoviocytes (FLS) from osteoarthritis (OA) FLS. The presence of epigenetic changes in long-term cultured cells suggest that rheumatoid FLS imprinting might contribute to pathogenic behavior. To understand how differentially methylated genes (DMGs) might participate in the pathogenesis of RA, we evaluated the stability of the RA signature and whether DMGs are enriched in specific pathways and ontology categories.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 1%
Unknown 86 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 23%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 20 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 16%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 24 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2013.
All research outputs
#4,808,603
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#925
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,770
of 204,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#19
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.