| Title |
Spatial genetic structure of bristle-thighed curlews (Numenius tahitiensis): breeding area differentiation not reflected on the non-breeding grounds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Conservation Genetics, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10592-014-0654-4 |
| Authors |
Sarah A. Sonsthagen, T. Lee Tibbitts, Robert E. Gill, Ian Williams, Sandra L. Talbot |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 16% |
| Professor | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 4 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Conservation Genetics
#468
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,153
of 226,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Conservation Genetics
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,077 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.