↓ Skip to main content

California's restless giant: the Long Valley Caldera

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
California's restless giant: the Long Valley Caldera
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2014
DOI 10.3133/fs20143056
Authors

David P. Hill, Roy A. Bailey, James W. Hendley, Stauffer Peter H., Mae Marcaida, Hill, David P., Bailey, Roy A., Hendley, James W., Stauffer, Peter H., Marcaida, Mae

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2018.
All research outputs
#14,694,712
of 24,648,202 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#1,261
of 2,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,299
of 316,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,648,202 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.