You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The chemistry of hydrothermal magnetite: A review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ore Geology Reviews, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2013.12.013 |
Authors |
Patrick Nadoll, Thomas Angerer, Jeffrey L. Mauk, David French, John Walshe |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 422 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 2 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Turkey | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Russia | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 409 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 89 | 21% |
Researcher | 62 | 15% |
Student > Master | 53 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 39 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 7% |
Other | 59 | 14% |
Unknown | 90 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 220 | 52% |
Chemistry | 30 | 7% |
Engineering | 22 | 5% |
Materials Science | 9 | 2% |
Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
Other | 22 | 5% |
Unknown | 112 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2018.
All research outputs
#8,880,246
of 25,998,826 outputs
Outputs from Ore Geology Reviews
#168
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,022
of 252,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ore Geology Reviews
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,998,826 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 252,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.