↓ Skip to main content

Flower development in Coffea arabica L.: new insights into MADS-box genes

Overview of attention for article published in Plant Reproduction, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Flower development in Coffea arabica L.: new insights into MADS-box genes
Published in
Plant Reproduction, April 2014
DOI 10.1007/s00497-014-0242-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Raphael Ricon de Oliveira, Igor Cesarino, Paulo Mazzafera, Marcelo Carnier Dornelas

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 59 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 13 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,355,479
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Plant Reproduction
#152
of 177 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#195,232
of 228,330 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Reproduction
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 177 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,330 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them