↓ Skip to main content

Reply to Blaauw et al., Boslough, Daulton, Gill et al., and Hardiman et al.: Younger Dryas impact proxies in Lake Cuitzeo, Mexico

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reply to Blaauw et al., Boslough, Daulton, Gill et al., and Hardiman et al.: Younger Dryas impact proxies in Lake Cuitzeo, Mexico
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2012
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1209463109
Authors

Isabel Israde-Alcántara, James L. Bischoff, Paul S. DeCarli, Gabriela Domínguez-Vázquez, Ted E. Bunch, Richard B. Firestone, James P. Kennett, Allen West

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 7%
United Kingdom 1 3%
France 1 3%
Spain 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 23 79%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 34%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 17 59%
Environmental Science 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 3 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#4,193,476
of 24,625,114 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#42,466
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,302
of 167,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#455
of 948 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,625,114 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 948 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.