You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Environmental Reviews and Case Studies: Shale Gas Development and Brook Trout: Scaling Best Management Practices to Anticipate Cumulative Effects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Practice, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1017/s1466046612000397 |
| Authors |
David R. Smith, Craig D. Snyder, Nathaniel P. Hitt, John A. Young, Stephen P. Faulkner |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 25 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 18% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 36% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,492,850
of 22,903,988 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Practice
#26
of 88 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,297
of 420,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Practice
#21
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,903,988 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 88 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.